ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Treatment of increased intracranial pressure secondary to otitic hydrocephalus.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Otitic hydrocephalus is defined as increased intracranial pressure secondary to acute mastoiditis with cerebral venous thrombosis, leading to visual morbidity from papilledema. As no standardized ophthalmological treatment for papilledema exists, this study aims to evaluate the impact of corticosteroids on visual and clinical outcomes. Methods: This retrospective chart review includes children ≤18 years old, with otitic hydrocephalus and papilledema. Patients were evaluated by ophthalmology between July 2022 and July 2024 at a quaternary children's hospital. Data from ophthalmologic visits, neuroimaging, and clinical courses were recorded. Results: Fourteen patients [nine male (64%) and five female] were identified; their average age was 5.6 years (range 2-9). All were treated with acetazolamide, anticoagulation, and antibiotics. Two patients (14%) underwent otologic surgery and neurosurgery. Twelve patients received corticosteroids; four (29%) needed further neurosurgery, while eight (64%) improved with corticosteroids alone. Visual acuity (VA), Frisen grade at presentation, and time to corticosteroid initiation were not predictive of corticosteroid success. Patients who had corticosteroids only vs. those who had surgery had a reduced length of stay. Five patients who presented with retinal changes on optical coherence tomography developed signs of optic disc atrophy at final appointment. Conclusion: This series shows that there could be a potential role for systemic corticosteroids in reducing the hospital duration of patients with otitic hydrocephalus. It demonstrates the need for close follow-up, as corticosteroid success is difficult to predict. Patients who present with retinal changes may be at higher risk for optic disc atrophy, potentially affecting visual function and requiring more frequent follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.