ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Implementation of developmental care in routine NICU practice and early clinical outcomes in preterm infants.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Critical Factors Influencing the Uptake of Breastfeeding Support Interventions in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Despite improved survival of preterm infants, neonatal complications and long-term morbidity remain high, highlighting the need for optimized care in neonatal intensive care units. Developmental care aims to reduce stress and better align the extrauterine environment with intrauterine conditions, and has been associated with improved short- and long-term outcomes in preterm infants. In Ukraine, its implementation is limited, and evidence on its association with clinical outcomes in routine neonatal practice is lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between the implementation of developmental care elements, including skin-to-skin contact, and early clinical outcomes in preterm infants. Materials and methods: This was a single-center, non-randomized observational before-after cohort study. The study compared outcomes of preterm infants before and after the implementation of developmental care as part of routine clinical practice, using a retrospective control group. Two groups were included: 91 infants receiving developmental care (19 extremely and 72 very preterm infants) and 119 infants receiving standard care (21 extremely and 98 very preterm infants). Results: Developmental care was associated with lower rates of late-onset sepsis in extremely (42.1% vs. 76.2%, Conclusion: Implementation of developmental care, including skin-to-skin contact, in preterm infants was associated with lower rates of late-onset sepsis, intraventricular hemorrhage, ROP, and postnatal growth failure, shorter hospital stays and mechanical ventilation, and higher rates of breastfeeding at discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.