ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Analysis of the anti-scalping mechanism of hospital appointment registration based on Bayesian theory.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a Bayesian-based anti-scalping mechanism integrated into a hospital appointment system in improving fairness, efficiency, and patient accessibility while reducing speculative bookings. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted from January 2019 to December 2022 (defined as the core observation period, with the intervention occurring in January 2021). Results up to mid-2023 are provided solely to demonstrate long-term trend stability. The Bayesian model identified "abnormal behaviors" based on a validated ground truth set, defined as accounts meeting at least two of the following criteria: (1) more than three cancelations within a 48 h window, (2) a single device ID associated with more than five medical card IDs, or (3) registration completion speeds faster than the 99th percentile of manual operation times (e.g., <2 s). These labels were manually verified by a cross-departmental audit team to minimize misclassification in the training set. Statistical comparisons were made using χ Results: After the anti-scalping mechanism was implemented, the appointment completion rate increased from 64.6% (2019) to 78.0% (2022) (χ Conclusion: Integrating Bayesian inference into outpatient appointment systems can effectively enhance fairness, efficiency, and patient trust by reducing speculative bookings and improving accessibility. The findings demonstrate that data-driven management frameworks can bridge the gap between algorithmic modeling and real-world hospital operations, providing a replicable strategy for intelligent, equitable healthcare resource allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.