ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Examination of the reliability and validity of a French adaptation of a graphic single-item of organizational identification.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research presents results from two studies investigating the psychometric qualities of a graphic single-item measuring organizational identification (i.e., the individual's perception of unity and feeling of being one with the organization in which they work). Conducted on two samples, the first study revealed the convergent validity of a single-item graphic scale, obtaining a positive correlation with a measure of the same construct but comprising multiple written items. This study also showed the incremental validity of the graphic single-item in explaining job satisfaction and work engagement over and above the variance explained by the multiple written items instrument. The second study replicated the results observed in the first study and established the test-retest reliability of the graphic single-item. Taken together, these results recognize the potential and qualities of the French adaptation of the graphic single-item and offer researchers and organizations a rapid and effective way of measuring this construct in French-speaking populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.