ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Mind-wandering in China and the UK: evidence of cross-cultural consistency.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Mind wandering has been studied using various operational definitions, resulting in conceptual inconsistencies. Understanding whether it reflects universal cognitive patterns or culturally shaped experiences is critical for theories of attention and self-regulation. Methods: A total of 17 British and 32 Chinese participants completed a monotonous writing task designed to provoke mind wandering, followed by a semi-structured interview probing the content and contexts of their thoughts. Results: Results revealed that mind wandering characteristically involves self-generated thoughts, with participants frequently aware of these and allowing them to continue. No significant cultural differences were found in the frequency or causes of mind wandering. However, British participants more frequently described its effects as non-negative, whereas Chinese participants emphasised negative outcomes. Discussion: This variation possibly reflects cultural values that prioritise effortful attention as a moral duty. This highlights the interplay between universal cognitive processes and cultural influences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.