ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Differential effects of child-appropriate music styles on executive function in preschool children: a longitudinal experimental study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early Childhood Movement- and Arts-Based Experiences and Executive Functions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Executive function is a key capacity underpinning preschool children's school readiness and self-regulation. Musical activities may facilitate executive function; however, direct, within-study comparisons of multiple child-appropriate musical styles remain limited. This study compared the effects of six musical styles (pop, jazz, Latin, electronic dance music, nursery rhymes, and folk/country) on preschoolers' inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility to assess their relative suitability. Methods: A longitudinal randomized controlled design was employed. A total of 115 children aged 4-5 years from a kindergarten in Chengdu were randomly assigned to six music-style groups or a control group. Over 4 weeks, the experimental groups participated in a brief daily classroom-based activity (10 min/weekday) that combined instrumental music exposure with rhythm-based clapping synchronized to the assigned style, whereas the control group engaged in quiet reading or drawing. Executive function was assessed at pretest, posttest, and one-month follow-up using the Peg Tapping Task, Rotating Can Task, and Dimensional Change Card Sort Task. Data were analyzed in SPSS using mixed-design ANOVAs, with Bonferroni-adjusted Results: No significant between-group differences were observed at baseline. Following the intervention, the music condition demonstrated greater improvements than the control group in inhibitory control and working memory at posttest and follow-up. Improvements in cognitive flexibility were comparatively modest. When musical styles were examined separately, statistically robust advantages over the control condition were primarily concentrated in the Latin music group, whereas other styles showed improvement trends that did not consistently remain significant after correction for multiple comparisons. Maintenance of gains at follow-up was most evident in the Latin group. Conclusion: Music-based intervention can facilitate executive-function development in preschool children, particularly in inhibitory control and working memory. However, style-related differences were selective rather than forming a stable hierarchical gradient across genres. Latin music showed the most consistent and sustained advantages within the present design, suggesting that rhythmic engagement may support certain components of executive function. Further research is needed to isolate the specific musical parameters underlying these differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.