ArticleJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine
Risk factors for extended hospital stay after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A national versus institutional comparison using propensity score matching.
Article in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-level posterior cervical-only fusion and instrumentation with versus without extension to C1: A short-term outcomes analysis using a large database.North American Spine Society journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study Design: Retrospective Cohort Study. Background: Elective surgical management of refractory degenerative cervical disease with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is considered the standard of care but may lead to prolonged postoperative length of stay (LOS), increasing patient burden and healthcare costs. While national databases such as the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) have identified risk factors for extended LOS, their applicability to individual institutions remains uncertain. We sought to evaluate the consistency of prolonged LOS risk factors between NSQIP and a single institutional database. Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients undergoing elective ACDF from 2008 to 2019 using NSQIP and single institutional databases. Inclusion criteria were age >18 years and current procedural terminology codes 22551, 22552, and 22554. Independent variables, including comorbidities, demographics, and perioperative data, were assessed as predictors of prolonged LOS, defined as >2 days. Patients were matched 1:1 using logistic regression and stratified into short- and long-stay cohorts. Results: 1353 NSQIP patients were matched to 1353 institutional patients. In the NSQIP cohort, anemia ( Conclusion: Risk factors for prolonged LOS after ACDF differed between NSQIP and the single-institution cohort, suggesting that national databases may lack the granularity needed for institution-specific decision-making. Institutional analyses may better support targeted quality improvement for elective ACDF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.