Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41929712›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026

Age-Related Differences in the Efficacy of Intense Pulsed Light Therapy for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Women.

Satoshi Gotoda, Yukihiro Sakai, Tomoya Nishida, Kei Ichikawa, Kazuo Ichikawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Satoshi GotodaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chukyo Eye Clinic, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0009-0007-6462-7979
Yukihiro SakaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chukyo Eye Clinic, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Tomoya NishidaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chukyo Eye Clinic, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Kei IchikawaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chukyo Eye Clinic, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Kazuo IchikawaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chukyo Eye Clinic, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Aging and hormonal factors influence meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), which can be treated by intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy. However, the influence of age on treatment response remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of aging on the outcomes of IPL therapy among female patients with MGD. Patients and Methods: Sixty-eight eyes of female patients who underwent four IPL treatment sessions were included. Patients were divided into two age groups: <50 years (39.5 ± 10.2 years, n = 30) and ≥50 years (72.5 ± 9.49 years, n = 38). Parameters assessed before and after IPL included corneal and conjunctival staining score, fluorescein tear film break-up time (FBUT), lipid layer thickness (LLT), subjective symptoms (Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness [SPEED] score), and meibomian gland parameters (meibum quality, expressibility, and meiboscore). Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests; Results: At baseline, the younger group had lower LLT ( Conclusion: IPL therapy improved MGD-related signs and symptoms in women of all ages. The observed age-related differences in the most responsive parameters suggest that age affects the therapeutic profile of IPL. These results may help guide age-appropriate MGD management.

Indexed as

age-related differencesintense pulsed lightlipid layer thicknessmeibomian gland dysfunctionstandard patient evaluation of eye dryness score

Identifiers

PMID41929712
PMCPMC13039656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.