ArticlePopulation research and policy review2026
Consistent Reports of Pregnancy/Birth Contexts and Links to Parental Experiences.
Article in Population research and policy review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The link between pregnancy/birth contexts and subsequent maternal, family, and child well-being is the subject of extensive research. Much of this work uses retrospectively reported survey data on birth contexts, particularly for birth intendedness and relationship status at birth, but rarely has research considered whether or how people might report birth contexts differently over time. In this paper, we used Waves III, IV, and V of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), the only nationally representative longitudinal dataset with repeated measures of pregnancy/birth contexts for the same live birth. Focusing on first births, we (a) examined if, and to what extent, individuals changed their retrospective reports of pregnancy wantedness and relationship status at birth, (b) identified if there are sociodemographic correlates of inconsistent reports, and (c) explored whether inconsistent reports are associated with parental experiences. Results showed that consistency ranges from 49 to 65% when comparing first birth wantedness and relationship status reports across all three waves among births first reported in Wave III ([Formula: see text] = 1083) and rises to 73-80% across the latter two waves when comparing births first reported in Wave IV ([Formula: see text] = 3766). We found weak evidence of social patterning of inconsistency, with only age emerging as a predictor for both indicators across the analytical samples, and we did not find evidence that inconsistency biased the association between birth context and parental experiences. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11113-026-10005-7.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.