ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
A methodological framework for validating a multi-domain physiological sensor for divers using a scalable data fusion platform.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Divers face numerous physiological hazards that can lead to diving disorders, yet the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood due to limitations in monitoring technologies capable of functioning underwater. To bridge this gap, it is necessary to critically evaluate novel monitoring technologies and develop approaches to determine their suitability for near real-time physiological assessment. Gold standard devices are typically used to validate new physiological sensors under controlled normobaric conditions, where their accuracy benefits from stable, low-interference environments. However, the absence of underwater gold standards and the complexity of underwater conditions make it difficult to determine whether measurement discrepancies arise from true physiological changes or sensor variability. Given the wide range of physiological responses elicited by diving, it is essential to deconstruct the underwater experience into its constituent factors to better isolate their individual effects. This article presents a comprehensive methodology for evaluating the performance of a novel physiological sensor designed for both land-based and underwater environments. To this end, human subject testing was conducted across three experimental environments: 1. dry normobaric testing, 2. dry hyperbaric testing, and 3. shallow water immersion. To facilitate these evaluations, a custom data acquisition platform was developed on Robot Operating System 2 (ROS 2), enabling coordinated synchronization of multiple heterogeneous data streams. This approach offers a scalable and reproducible framework for validating physiological monitoring technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.