Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41929636›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026

Gender differences in access to extension services and major farm inputs among paddy seed growers in Rautahat district of Nepal.

Sandeep Timalsina, Rajesh Paudel, Hari Krishna Panta, Milan Subedi, Jay Chaurasia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sandeep TimalsinaDepartment of Agricultural Extension and Rural Sociology, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Sciences, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Rajesh PaudelDepartment of Agricultural Extension and Rural Sociology, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Sciences, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Hari Krishna PantaDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Sciences, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Milan SubediDepartment of Agricultural Extension and Rural Sociology, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Sciences, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Jay ChaurasiaDepartment of Agricultural Extension and Rural Sociology, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Sciences, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Extension services for paddy seed farmers are essential for boosting agricultural productivity; however, significant gender gaps in access to these services exist in Nepal. This study, carried out in 2024 in Rautahat district, explored the role of gender and socio-economic characteristics in determining access to paddy seed extension services and major agricultural inputs. Methods: A convergent parallel mixed-methods research design was used. Two hundred and sixty-five farmers were surveyed with a structured questionnaire using a multistage sampling method. Qualitative data were gathered through focus group discussions and key informant interviews. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression. Results: The results showed that gender, income, age, ethnicity, and farm type influenced access to extension services, with the logistic model explaining 41.6% of the variation. Although men had higher access to these services, women were more likely to utilize them once accessed. Education, farm size, and off-farm employment had limited influence on perceived access. The farm inputs access model accounted for 42.0% of the variation, with participation level, farm type, and ethnicity being the strongest predictors. Discussion: Perception analysis revealed that women held more positive attitudes toward extension services but faced structural and social barriers, such as fewer female extension agents, financial constraints, and limited decision-making power, which hindered their ability to make data-driven decisions. Conclusion: The findings highlight the need for gender-sensitive and appropriate extension strategies to ensure equitable access for all farmers, ultimately improving access and productivity, especially for women and marginalized groups.

Indexed as

extensionfarm inputsgenderpaddyseed

Identifiers

PMID41929636
PMCPMC13038595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.