Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41929627›Full record

ArticleTransportation research record2024

If You Cut It Will They Ride? Longitudinal Examination of the Elasticity of Public Transport Ridership in the Post-Pandemic Era.

Paul Redelmeier, Ahmed El-Geneidy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transportation research record, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paul RedelmeierMcGill University, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5243-366X
Ahmed El-GeneidyMcGill University, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0942-4016

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past two years, public transport ridership has declined because of COVID-19 pandemic health measures and new working from home policies. This decline in ridership has caused major financial stress on public transport agencies around the world. Several agencies have responded to this financial stress by reducing services. The extent to which these service cuts will affect transit ridership is unknown because of the changing operational environment in the post-pandemic world. Our study uses a longitudinal panel data from Montréal, Quebec, Canada, to explore the relationship between route-level ridership and operational factors over time. We find that public transport ridership demand at the route level is highly elastic when compared to trip frequency and has become more elastic after the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings imply that agencies cutting service in the post-pandemic era run a much more significant risk of creating a "doom spiral," where service reductions spur greater declines in ridership, forcing further reductions. Demand was found to be most elastic on more frequent routes, so agencies should prioritize maintaining services on their core routes in the post-pandemic era. This study can be of use to public transit planners and policymakers considering making service changes to attract more riders or trying to respond to post-COVID-19 financial stress.

Indexed as

community resources and impactsequity in transportationpublic transitpublic transportationsustainability and resiliencetransportation and society

Identifiers

PMID41929627
PMCPMC13043041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.