Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41929624›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2026

Institutional Biobanking as shared public health infrastructure: a financially sustainable service center model.

M V Olson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

M V OlsonThe Johns Hopkins BioBank, Genetic Resources Core Facility, Department of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Institutional biobanks are essential infrastructure supporting clinical research, translational discovery, and public health preparedness. However, many biobanks rely on institutional subsidies or unstable grant funding, creating long-term financial vulnerability. The Johns Hopkins Biobank, operating within the multi-division Genetic Resources Core Facility (GRCF), provides a practice-based example of a financially resilient model for academic biobanking. As a College of American Pathologists (CAP) accredited program structured as a fee-for-service enterprise, the Biobank targets a net-zero financial balance in accordance with U.S. federal guidance for service centers. All operational costs, including personnel, infrastructure, and institutional overhead, are recovered through transparent annual storage fees and transactional service charges, enabling high-quality stewardship without reliance on external subsidy. Integration within a broader service center portfolio provides operational flexibility, supports rigorous governance and regulatory compliance, and ensures continuity during periods of fluctuating research demand. This case illustrates how aligning biobanking with institutional service center frameworks can strengthen financial sustainability, enhance accountability, and support long-term access to high-quality biospecimens as part of public health research infrastructure. This model supports public health preparedness by ensuring stable access to biospecimens critical for infectious disease response, clinical trials, and translational science. Further, it offers transferable lessons for academic institutions seeking to future-proof biobanking operations while upholding rigorous standards for quality and participant trust.

Indexed as

biospecimen managementcore facilityfinancial stabilityinstitutional biobankingpublic health infrastructurequality managementservice centersustainability

Identifiers

PMID41929624
PMCPMC13038606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.