ArticleFrontiers in health services2026
Institutional Biobanking as shared public health infrastructure: a financially sustainable service center model.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Institutional biobanks are essential infrastructure supporting clinical research, translational discovery, and public health preparedness. However, many biobanks rely on institutional subsidies or unstable grant funding, creating long-term financial vulnerability. The Johns Hopkins Biobank, operating within the multi-division Genetic Resources Core Facility (GRCF), provides a practice-based example of a financially resilient model for academic biobanking. As a College of American Pathologists (CAP) accredited program structured as a fee-for-service enterprise, the Biobank targets a net-zero financial balance in accordance with U.S. federal guidance for service centers. All operational costs, including personnel, infrastructure, and institutional overhead, are recovered through transparent annual storage fees and transactional service charges, enabling high-quality stewardship without reliance on external subsidy. Integration within a broader service center portfolio provides operational flexibility, supports rigorous governance and regulatory compliance, and ensures continuity during periods of fluctuating research demand. This case illustrates how aligning biobanking with institutional service center frameworks can strengthen financial sustainability, enhance accountability, and support long-term access to high-quality biospecimens as part of public health research infrastructure. This model supports public health preparedness by ensuring stable access to biospecimens critical for infectious disease response, clinical trials, and translational science. Further, it offers transferable lessons for academic institutions seeking to future-proof biobanking operations while upholding rigorous standards for quality and participant trust.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.