ReviewFrontiers in health services2026
Preparing the workforce for telehealth practice: a scoping review.
Review in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review was undertaken with the aim of locating and mapping telehealth or virtual care curricula or competencies for health professionals in training or practice. The design followed the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and conforms with the requirements of the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. Data sources included Medline (Ovid), Emcare (Ovid), Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health (CINAHL), ERIC (EBSCO) and Scopus plus grey literature databases, customized Google searching, targeted websites, and consultation with content experts in June 2024-Jan 2025. The team members worked independently to extract data. Content analysis was used to map the data, with the use of a data extraction table developed by the review team for the purpose of preparing, organising, and reporting identified evidence. Team meetings were used to collate analysis and facilitated consensus regarding the creation of categories and subsequent themes. The search identified 3,189 peer-reviewed works and 7 grey literature items. After screening 31 publications met criteria for inclusion. Analys of included evidence indicated that telehealth services are safe, effective and increase health service access if delivered by appropriately qualified personnel but competence in face-to-face care provision does not automatically transfer to competency in virtual delivery. The search identified a series of competencies pertinent to telehealth-based clinical encounters, including the call management competencies to prepare for a consult; communicate with clients; conduct the consult; and close. The findings provide information in respect to telehealth essential inclusions in undergraduate nursing curricula and nursing professional development programs. The literature demonstrates a slow uptake in embedding new practice models in education programs for the future health and nursing workforce. A need exists to confirm the competency requirements for telehealth delivery and accelerate related content into nursing and health workforce curricula and professional development activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.