ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Ontology- and LLM-based data harmonization for federated learning in healthcare.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI semantics for biomedical data integration.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Integrating large language models for enhanced predictive analytics in healthcare.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Bridging data and discovery: a survey on knowledge graphs in AI for science.National science review · 2026Review
- Predicting concrete compressive strength using optimized deep learning and large language models.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for autoimmune diseases.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Semantic heterogeneity across electronic health records (EHRs) limits scalable and privacy-preserving analytics in healthcare. While federated learning (FL) enables collaborative modeling without sharing raw data, it requires consistent, ontology-aligned representations. We present an ontology- and large language model (LLM)-based data harmonization approach to support secure, interoperable FL workflows. Methods: We propose a general two-step pipeline for converting or annotating clinical text into a predefined target ontology format. First, candidate concepts are retrieved from the target vocabulary using embedding-based similarity search or ontology cross-references. Second, an LLM acts as a semantic validator, accepting or rejecting candidates based on explicit equivalence or subsumption criteria. The approach is ontology-agnostic and configurable; mapping to MONDO and HPO is demonstrated as a real-world use case. Final accepted mappings were evaluated against independent human expert assessment. Results: Across two clinical datasets, expert-LLM agreement reached up to 92%, with overall performance ranging from 78% to 91% depending on candidate-generation strategy. Retrieval alone was insufficient for reliable mapping, whereas LLM-based validation substantially improved precision while complementary retrieval strategies improved recall. Discussion: The proposed pipeline transforms ontology-based harmonization from a manual expert task into a reusable and configurable workflow suitable for federated healthcare research. By combining high-recall retrieval with LLM-based semantic adjudication, the approach enables scalable, privacy-preserving conversion of heterogeneous clinical text into standardized representations across domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.