ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Myasthenia gravis and anxiety-depression states: an integrated clinical and Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Myasthenia gravis with dysphagia as the first symptom and misdiagnosed as anxiety-depressive state: a case report.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease affecting the postsynaptic membrane at the neuromuscular junction. Anxiety disorder and depression are common psychiatric comorbidities in patients with MG. However, the potential causal relationship between MG and these mental health conditions remains unclear. Methods: A retrospective analysis was first conducted to collect relevant data from 96 patients with MG at the time of their initial definitive diagnosis at our center. The cohort was divided into an anxiety group and a non-anxiety group, and into a depression group and a non-depression group. Statistical methods were employed to examine the relationship between MG scale scores and the presence of anxiety and depression. Subsequently, for the first time, we employed a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) approach to explore the causal relationships between MG, anxiety disorders, and depression. We utilized the largest and most recent European population genome-wide association studies available for the three phenotypes to extract genetic variants that could serve as instrumental variables. The inverse variance weighted model was used as the primary analysis method. Multiple sensitivity analyses and pleiotropy tests were conducted to validate the robustness of the primary findings. Results: In clinical studies, it was observed that 62.5% of MG patients exhibited anxiety symptoms, while 46.90% presented depressive symptoms with myasthenia gravis (MG). Through univariate regression analysis, no direct associations were identified between gender, age, disease duration, or MGFA classification and the occurrence of anxiety and depression. However, Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score and Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score were significantly associated with anxiety and depression among patients with MG ( Conclusion: In real-world clinical research, patients with MG who have more severe disease are more likely to present with anxiety and depression, and the two conditions show a clear association. However, from a genetic perspective, Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis does not support a causal relationship between MG and anxiety or depression in European populations. The correlation observed in our clinical research may reflect non-causal associations not explained by genetic liability, potentially involving shared genetic architecture or non-genetic mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.