ReviewFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
Posture evaluation and treatment in adolescents through wearable technology: a systematic review.
Review in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developmental Postural Modeling: A Historical and Conceptual Narrative Review of Posture Assessment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Three-Dimensional Surface Topography for the Assessment of Spinal Alignment: A Cross-Sectional Study of Biomechanical Correlates.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Postural health is crucial during adolescence, a period marked by rapid physical growth and increased susceptibility to postural deformities due to sedentary lifestyles. Wearable technologies offer a promising solution for spinal posture monitoring and correction, utilizing sensors, inertial measurement units (IMUs), and artificial intelligence to provide real-time biofeedback. However, current wearable devices face limitations, including inconsistent methodologies, sensor attachment issues, and the absence of immediate corrective feedback. This systematic review aims to determine the status of clinical and experimental research in the area of wearable technology designed for spinal monitoring in adolescents. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched multiple databases for relevant studies published until December 31, 2024, identifying studies about technology/ies able to monitor posture of the spine in the adolescents. The Systematic review protocol is available in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with the following number: CRD42024532328. Results: Three studies have been identified including a total of 103 participants, comprising 58 males and 45 females Findings indicate that while existing wearable systems can track posture, they often lack methodological rigor, real-time feedback capabilities, and comprehensive evaluation protocols. Discussion: There is a critical need for innovative digital health solutions that integrate real-time monitoring and personalized interventions to address postural issues effectively. Despite their potential, wearable technologies face challenges related to usability, effectiveness, and evidence quality. Future research should focus on developing user-friendly designs, strengthening methodological approaches, and integrating multiple monitoring techniques to enhance spinal health in adolescents. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/recorddashboard, PROSPERO CRD42024532328.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.