ArticleIEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences2025
Impact of detector parameters and image resolution modeling on dedicated brain PET imaging.
Article in IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High performance brain PET scanners suitable for accurate and precise measurement of uptake in small regions of the brain require high spatial resolution (1.5-2 mm) together with high system sensitivity. While small cross section crystals are needed to achieve high spatial resolution with pixelated detectors, effective system sensitivity requires long crystals and good time-of-flight (TOF) resolution. In addition, depending on crystal thickness, some level of depth-of-interaction (DOI) capability may also be needed to reduce parallax error. While various methods for DOI measurement can be utilized within the detector, the impact on reconstructed spatial resolution as a function of crystal thickness needs to be carefully evaluated. The focus of this work is to use Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the impact of crystal size, thickness, and DOI resolution on the reconstructed spatial resolution in a high-resolution brain scanner design. Two crystal cross sections were chosen, 1.6 mm × 1.6 mm and 2 mm × 2 mm, and three different LSO crystal thickness (10 mm, 15 mm, and 20 mm) were evaluated. We evaluated these system designs without DOI capability and with DOI resolution (4-12 mm) for varying crystal thickness. In addition, we evaluated the use of image-space resolution modeling (IRM) techniques, which can mitigate losses in spatial resolution and positioning accuracy due to parallax error and Compton scatter, and to complement the advantages of DOI capability. A brain size elliptical phantom with small spheres was simulated to study the overall benefit in uptake measurements for small objects using the contrast recovery coefficient (CRC) metric. Our results show that a system with 2 mm × 2 mm crystals can provide comparable image quality in terms of CRC measurement than one with 1.6 mm × 1.6 mm crystals. However, crystal thickness has a bigger impact on spatial resolution and CRC with performance degrading with best performance achieved with 10 mm thick crystals. DOI measurement is necessary with longer crystals in order to maintain good imaging performance with high sensitivity. For the 15 mm thick crystals 9 mm DOI resolution is needed to compensate for the loss in spatial resolution compared to 10 mm thick crystals without DOI, but still with lower CRC. A similar conclusion is reached for 20 mm crystals with 4 mm DOI resolution. Alternatively, IRM methods can provide improved and similar performance for all crystal thicknesses studied here, indicating a pathway for achieving our brain scanner design goals without additional cost, complexity, and performance tradeoffs. This work provides a systematic investigation for designing future brain PET systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.