ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2026
Case report: a clinical case of a giant coronary artery aneurysm treated by percutaneous exclusion.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This case report contributes to the limited literature on giant coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs), particularly those arising from secondary coronary branches. It highlights the utility of multimodal imaging in diagnosis and supports endovascular management as a viable treatment option in high-risk patients. Case summary: A middle-aged patient presented with a paracardiac mass incidentally discovered on imaging. Further evaluation revealed a giant aneurysm originating from a secondary branch of the right coronary artery. Given its large size and high rupture risk, the patient underwent successful percutaneous exclusion with a covered stent. Post-procedural recovery was uneventful, and follow-up imaging confirmed aneurysm exclusion without complications. Conclusion: This case emphasizes the importance of individualized treatment planning for giant CAAs and illustrates the effectiveness of percutaneous intervention using covered stents. It also reinforces the role of comprehensive imaging in guiding both diagnosis and management of rare coronary anomalies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.