ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Longitudinal and radial microgradients in porosity and canal diameter in femur bone and its implications for bone regeneration and bone repair implants.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research Progress on the Structure and Properties of Medical Bone Implants Based on Additive Manufacturing.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Advances in functional nanomaterials and piezoelectric biomaterials for personalized intramedullary fixation: addressing age-related orthopedic challenges.Frontiers in chemistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Bone exhibits hierarchical structural gradients that optimize mechanical performance and regenerative potential. Longitudinal and radial variations in porosity and canal architecture of the femur influence load distribution, vascularization, and remodeling. Understanding these gradients is essential for designing scaffolds and implants that mimic native bone structure and function. This study quantified longitudinal and radial microgradients in porosity and canal diameter along the rabbit femur and explored their implications for bone regeneration and repair implant design. Rabbit femora were divided into proximal, mid-shaft, and distal regions. Methods: High-resolution micro-computed tomography quantified cortical thickness, porosity, and canal diameter along radial and longitudinal axes in micron-scale resolutions. Results and Discussion: Compressive mechanical testing of slices determined local moduli, which were correlated with microstructural parameters to establish structure-function relationships. Cortical thickness peaked at the mid-shaft and decreased toward both ends. Porosity and canal diameter increased radially toward the medullary cavity and longitudinally toward the bone ends. Upto 500 μm bone thickness from the outer surface toward modullary cavity, porosity and canal diameter ranged, respectively, from ∼5% to 40 μm at the mid-shaft to ∼40% and 110 μm at the ends. At 750 μm thickness, porosity and canal diameter ranged, respectively, from ∼5% to 50 ∼m at the mid-shaft to ∼80% and 200 μm at the ends. As expected, compressive moduli declined with increasing porosity and canal size. The mid-shaft, with the lowest porosity and smallest canals, exhibited the highest modulus of around 15 MPa, which decreased to 5 MPa toward the ends. The rabbit femur displays distinct longitudinal and radial microgradients in porosity and canal architecture that govern local stiffness. These gradients define structural benchmarks for designing functionally graded tissue engineering scaffolds and bone implants that replicate native tissue structure and stiffness transitions to promote osteoconduction, osteoinduction, osteogenesis in bone regeneration and improve osseointegration of bone implants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.