Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41929424›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026

Longitudinal and radial microgradients in porosity and canal diameter in femur bone and its implications for bone regeneration and bone repair implants.

Xiao Zhao, Xiaojun Yu, Swera Naz, Agila Zhussupova, Dilhan M Kalyon, Cevat Erisken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiao ZhaoDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Stevens Institute of Technology, Charles V. Schaefer, Jr. School of Engineering & Science, Hoboken, NJ, United States.
Xiaojun YuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Charles V. Schaefer, Jr. School of Engineering & Science, Hoboken, NJ, United States.
Swera NazDepartment of Chemical and Materials Engineering, School of Engineering and Digital Sciences, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Agila ZhussupovaDepartment of Chemical and Materials Engineering, School of Engineering and Digital Sciences, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Dilhan M Kalyon *Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Stevens Institute of Technology, Charles V. Schaefer, Jr. School of Engineering & Science, Hoboken, NJ, United States.
Cevat Erisken *Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, School of Engineering and Digital Sciences, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Bone exhibits hierarchical structural gradients that optimize mechanical performance and regenerative potential. Longitudinal and radial variations in porosity and canal architecture of the femur influence load distribution, vascularization, and remodeling. Understanding these gradients is essential for designing scaffolds and implants that mimic native bone structure and function. This study quantified longitudinal and radial microgradients in porosity and canal diameter along the rabbit femur and explored their implications for bone regeneration and repair implant design. Rabbit femora were divided into proximal, mid-shaft, and distal regions. Methods: High-resolution micro-computed tomography quantified cortical thickness, porosity, and canal diameter along radial and longitudinal axes in micron-scale resolutions. Results and Discussion: Compressive mechanical testing of slices determined local moduli, which were correlated with microstructural parameters to establish structure-function relationships. Cortical thickness peaked at the mid-shaft and decreased toward both ends. Porosity and canal diameter increased radially toward the medullary cavity and longitudinally toward the bone ends. Upto 500 μm bone thickness from the outer surface toward modullary cavity, porosity and canal diameter ranged, respectively, from ∼5% to 40 μm at the mid-shaft to ∼40% and 110 μm at the ends. At 750 μm thickness, porosity and canal diameter ranged, respectively, from ∼5% to 50 ∼m at the mid-shaft to ∼80% and 200 μm at the ends. As expected, compressive moduli declined with increasing porosity and canal size. The mid-shaft, with the lowest porosity and smallest canals, exhibited the highest modulus of around 15 MPa, which decreased to 5 MPa toward the ends. The rabbit femur displays distinct longitudinal and radial microgradients in porosity and canal architecture that govern local stiffness. These gradients define structural benchmarks for designing functionally graded tissue engineering scaffolds and bone implants that replicate native tissue structure and stiffness transitions to promote osteoconduction, osteoinduction, osteogenesis in bone regeneration and improve osseointegration of bone implants.

Indexed as

bone microstructurebone regenerationcanal diametercortical porosityfemurgradient biomaterialsimplant designmechanical properties

Identifiers

PMID41929424
PMCPMC13038985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.