Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41929406›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in radiology2026

Biologically informed dual deep learning for skeletal maturity prediction in pediatrics.

Eugene Rezk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Eugene RezkTrauma Center Vienna - Meidling Site, Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: Accurate bone age estimation is critical for clinical diagnostics, forensic assessments, and growth research. Traditional methods rely on manual interpretation of radiographs, which is subjective and time-consuming. This Perspective introduces a biologically informed dual deep learning framework that leverages published physiological data to conceptually support bone age prediction. Methods: The framework integrates anatomical and developmental knowledge with a dual neural network architecture. One network extracts morphological features from publicly available datasets, while the second captures age-related growth patterns via supervised learning. No new human or animal data were collected. Illustrative simulations and conceptual analyses explore expected model behavior. Results: Simulations indicate that incorporating biologically informed priors can improve bone age estimation. Embedding physiological knowledge promotes more stable training, reduces prediction variability, and produces outputs that better align with normative growth trajectories compared to conventional AI models without biological priors. Conclusions: We present a theoretically grounded, AI-driven concept for bone age estimation using only published data. Combining biological knowledge with a dual deep learning approach may enhance reproducibility, interpretability, and efficiency. Future work should validate this framework on real-world imaging datasets and assess its integration into automated clinical assessment pipelines.

Indexed as

biologically informed modelingconvolutional neural networks (CNNs)growth trajectory analysishybrid AI modelspediatric radiologyRichards growth modelskeletal age estimation

Identifiers

PMID41929406
PMCPMC13039097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.