ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Enhancing laparoscopic simulator performance with eye-tracking video feedback: a mixed-methods pilot study.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The utility of eye-tracking combined with video-feedback to enhance laparoscopic simulator training remains unexplored. This mixed-methods pilot study aimed to evaluate whether visualising gaze patterns during video feedback improves simulator performance and training experience. Materials and methods: Ten surgical residents were randomised into an experimental group (receiving gaze-overlay video feedback) or a control group (standard video feedback). Participants performed standardised tasks in the Simball Box simulator. Quantitative performance metrics (time, error rates) and eye-tracking data (gaze patterns via Tobii Pro) were analysed. Qualitative data were collected through pre- and post-questionnaires and a subsequent group interview to assess the perceived value of the training. Results: Although 90% of residents had prior experience, the majority (60%) found the specific tasks more challenging than anticipated. Subjective ratings of feedback value did not differ significantly between groups. However, objective heat map analysis revealed that the experimental group adopted significantly more focused gaze patterns. Qualitative interviews underscored that while technological feedback is valuable, it is most effective when paired with expert mentorship. Conclusion: This pilot study suggests that eye-tracking feedback may facilitate more efficient visual strategies during laparoscopic training. While the experimental group demonstrated initial performance gains, larger cohorts are needed to statistically validate these findings. The study further emphasises that for simulation technology to be meaningful, it must be integrated into a structured curriculum with expert guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.