Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41929379›Full record

ReviewJournal of anesthesia and translational medicine2025

Remimazolam in anesthesia and sedation: A narrative review.

Yan Dong, Jun Ma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Age-Stratified EDDrug design, development and therapy · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yan DongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing 100000, China.
Jun MaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University-Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing 100000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remimazolam, an innovative sedative, provides a rapid onset and quick recovery by being rapidly hydrolyzed into pharmacologically inactive CNS7054 via ubiquitous nonspecific esterases. Its pharmacokinetic characteristics (high clearance rate, small steady-state volume of distribution, short terminal half-life, and no tissue accumulation) further lay the foundation for clinical application. Compared with traditional sedative drugs, the prominent innovations of this drug are reflected in three aspects: first, it has less impact on the respiratory and circulatory systems, with stable hemodynamics and a low incidence of discomfort at the administration site; second, its sedative effect can be specifically antagonized by flumazenil, allowing for more flexible safety regulation; third, it shows excellent safety and effectiveness in special populations such as elderly patients and those with comorbid cardiovascular diseases. Clinical evidence shows that remimazolam is more effective than similar drugs in scenarios such as gastrointestinal endoscopy, operating rooms, and ICUs. Its reliable performance in special populations further supports its value as a sedative that combines innovation with clinical practicality and holds broad application prospects. This review aims to systematically elaborate on the pharmacological properties and clinical application value of remimazolam, a new benzodiazepine derivative, and provide references for its standardized use in various diagnostic and therapeutic scenarios and special populations.

Indexed as

General anesthesiaPharmacokineticsRemimazolam sedativeSafety

Identifiers

PMID41929379
PMCPMC13001776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.