ArticlePlant and soil2026
Phosphorus and base cations drive contrasting root dynamics in a central Amazon forest.
Article in Plant and soil, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: In highly weathered soils of central Amazonia, where nutrients such as phosphorus (P) and base cations are scarce, fertilization experiments have demonstrated above- and belowground effects on total net primary productivity (NPP). This study examined how fine root stocks and turnover responded to added nutrients over a two-year period. We predicted that adding a limiting nutrient would decrease fine root stocks and increase turnover, with the strongest effects from P, followed by base cations, and no response to N. Methods: Fine roots (< 2 mm diameter) were sampled from the 0-30 cm soil layer in a low-fertility primary forest in central Amazon subjected to a large-scale factorial experiment adding P, base cations, and N over two years. Fine root turnover was calculated as the ratio between fine root productivity, measured with in-growth cores, and fine root stock. Results: Fine root stocks remained unchanged with nutrient addition. However, P increased root turnover by 23% and 48% in the first and second years, respectively, while base cations addition reduced turnover by 24% in year two. N had no significant effect, though a trend toward reduced turnover was observed in the second year. Conclusion: The results of this study show that fine root standing stock and turnover in the central Amazon are regulated by soil nutrient availability, especially P and base cations. The contrasting responses observed suggest distinct belowground resource-use strategies for different nutrients, shaped by the nutrient specific mobility in the soil and physiological role in the plant. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11104-026-08303-2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.