Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41929363›Full record

ArticlePlant and soil2026

Phosphorus and base cations drive contrasting root dynamics in a central Amazon forest.

Jéssica Schmeisk-Rosa, Kelly M Andersen, Amanda L Cordeiro, Anna Carolina Martins Moraes, Ana Cláudia Francisco Salomão, Rafael Leandro de Assis, Raffaello Di Ponzio, Renata Vilar de Almeida, Maria Pires Martins, Hellen Fernanda Viana Cunha and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant and soil, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Jéssica Schmeisk-RosaCoordination of Environmental Dynamics, National Institute for Amazonian Research, Manaus, Brazil.
Kelly M AndersenFaculty of Environment, Science and Economy, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1460-9904
Amanda L CordeiroDepartment of Plant & Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7226-0133
Anna Carolina Martins MoraesCoordination of Environmental Dynamics, National Institute for Amazonian Research, Manaus, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2541-5320
Ana Cláudia Francisco SalomãoBiological Dynamics of Forest Fragment Project, National Institute for Amazonian Research, Manaus, Brazil.
Rafael Leandro de AssisCoordination of Environmental Dynamics, National Institute for Amazonian Research, Manaus, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8468-6414
Raffaello Di PonzioCoordination of Environmental Dynamics, National Institute for Amazonian Research, Manaus, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7527-3594
Renata Vilar de AlmeidaBiological Dynamics of Forest Fragment Project, National Institute for Amazonian Research, Manaus, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4634-5293
Maria Pires MartinsCoordination of Environmental Dynamics, National Institute for Amazonian Research, Manaus, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8094-1879
Hellen Fernanda Viana CunhaCoordination of Environmental Dynamics, National Institute for Amazonian Research, Manaus, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9205-3895
Nathielly Pires MartinsTUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2501-747X
Sheila Trierveiler de SouzaCoordination of Environmental Dynamics, National Institute for Amazonian Research, Manaus, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7988-8548
Gyovanni Augusto Aguiar RibeiroCoordination of Environmental Dynamics, National Institute for Amazonian Research, Manaus, Brazil.
José Augusto SalimPlant Biology Department, Institute of Biology, State University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8675-7068
Érick OblitasCoordination of Environmental Dynamics, National Institute for Amazonian Research, Manaus, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9344-2411
Sara Deambrozi CoelhoCoordination of Environmental Dynamics, National Institute for Amazonian Research, Manaus, Brazil.
Adriana C ConceiçãoCoordination of Environmental Dynamics, National Institute for Amazonian Research, Manaus, Brazil.
Bruno Takeshi Tanaka PortelaCoordination of Environmental Dynamics, National Institute for Amazonian Research, Manaus, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1223-6665
Oscar J Valverde-BarrantesCoordination of Environmental Dynamics, National Institute for Amazonian Research, Manaus, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7327-7647
José Luís C CamargoCoordination of Environmental Dynamics, National Institute for Amazonian Research, Manaus, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0370-9878
Patrick MeirSchool of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2362-0398
Anja RammigTUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Iain P HartleyFaculty of Environment, Science and Economy, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9183-6617
Carlos Alberto Nobre QuesadaCoordination of Environmental Dynamics, National Institute for Amazonian Research, Manaus, Brazil.
Laynara F LugliCoordination of Environmental Dynamics, National Institute for Amazonian Research, Manaus, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8404-4841

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: In highly weathered soils of central Amazonia, where nutrients such as phosphorus (P) and base cations are scarce, fertilization experiments have demonstrated above- and belowground effects on total net primary productivity (NPP). This study examined how fine root stocks and turnover responded to added nutrients over a two-year period. We predicted that adding a limiting nutrient would decrease fine root stocks and increase turnover, with the strongest effects from P, followed by base cations, and no response to N. Methods: Fine roots (< 2 mm diameter) were sampled from the 0-30 cm soil layer in a low-fertility primary forest in central Amazon subjected to a large-scale factorial experiment adding P, base cations, and N over two years. Fine root turnover was calculated as the ratio between fine root productivity, measured with in-growth cores, and fine root stock. Results: Fine root stocks remained unchanged with nutrient addition. However, P increased root turnover by 23% and 48% in the first and second years, respectively, while base cations addition reduced turnover by 24% in year two. N had no significant effect, though a trend toward reduced turnover was observed in the second year. Conclusion: The results of this study show that fine root standing stock and turnover in the central Amazon are regulated by soil nutrient availability, especially P and base cations. The contrasting responses observed suggest distinct belowground resource-use strategies for different nutrients, shaped by the nutrient specific mobility in the soil and physiological role in the plant. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11104-026-08303-2.

Indexed as

Fine root stockFine root turnoverNutrient availabilityNutrient fertilization experimentTropical forest

Identifiers

PMID41929363
PMCPMC13038795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.