ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Domain-adapted language model using reinforcement learning for various dementias.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Large language models excel at processing complex clinical data and advanced reasoning, yet domain-specific adaptation is essential to realize their full potential in fields such as Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). Here, we present a generative language model for ADRD fine-tuned via reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards using a self-certainty-aware advantage. Model development and validation leveraged data from five ADRD cohorts, totaling 54, 535 participants. Our framework integrates demographics, personal and family medical histories, medication use, neuropsychological test results, functional assessments, physical and neurological examination findings, laboratory data and multimodal neuroimaging to construct comprehensive clinical profiles. On held-out testing data involving 36, 688 participants, our model achieved robust performance on syndromic classification, primary etiological diagnosis and biomarker prediction. Model predictions were validated against postmortem-confirmed diagnoses, and clinical utility was demonstrated in a controlled within-subjects crossover study where board-certified neurologists reviewed cases with and without model assistance, showing that exposure to model responses improved diagnostic performance. These results demonstrate that targeted domain adaptation with reinforcement learning can enable language models to deliver accurate, reasoning-driven support in ADRD evaluation. Prospective validation will be essential to translate these advances into improved patient outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.