ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Recovery of Dexterous Motor Control via Non-Monosynaptic Corticospinal Pathways.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fine motor control of the human arm is assumed to depend on monosynaptic connections between the motor cortex and spinal motoneurons. We report that people with post-stroke hemiparesis could regain dexterous control using non-monosynaptic corticospinal tract (CST) projections during epidural cervical spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Participants in our pilot clinical study demonstrated the ability to improve strength, reaching smoothness, and fine force control of the arm and hand while receiving continuous stimulation. Detailed electrophysiology of corticospinal connectivity with transcranial magnetic stimulation, electromyography spectral analysis, and single motor-unit firing showed that SCS did not reliably strengthen CST-activation of motoneurons. Instead, residual CST axons sculpted the strength of spinal reflexes produced by each pulse of SCS via polysynaptic mechanisms, including presynaptic gating of sensory afferent excitability, to promote functionally relevant muscle activation patterns. Our findings reveal the ability of non-monosynaptic CST pathways to finely tune spinal motor output in humans after stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.