Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41929225›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Rapid cortical mapping with cross-participant encoding models.

Jerry Tang, Alexander G Huth

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexander G Huth

Funding

Assessing semantic encoding and decoding models in stroke-induced aphasiaF32DC022178 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Jerry Tang · 2024 to 2026
$225k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC022178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voxelwise encoding models trained on functional MRI data can produce detailed maps of cortical organization. However, voxelwise encoding models must be trained on many hours of brain responses from each participant, limiting clinical applications. In this study, we introduce a cross-participant modeling framework for rapid cortical mapping. In this framework, voxelwise encoding models are trained on many hours of brain responses from previously scanned reference participants, and then transferred to a new participant by aligning brain responses using a small set of stimuli. We evaluated cross-participant encoding models on linguistic semantic mapping, non-linguistic semantic mapping, and auditory mapping. In each case we found that cross-participant encoding models had more accurate selectivity estimates and prediction performance than within-participant encoding models trained on the same amount of data from the new participant. We also found that cross-participant encoding models improved with the amount of data from each reference participant and the number of reference participants. These results demonstrate that cross-participant modeling can substantially reduce the amount of data required for accurate cortical mapping, which may facilitate new clinical applications of functional neuroimaging.

Identifiers

PMID41929225
PMCPMC13041935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.