ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
A set of constitutive promoters with graded strengths for gene expression in diverse cyanobacterial strains.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cyanobacteria have garnered interest as promising biological platforms for producing renewable biofuel, chemical feedstock, and bioactive molecules. For biotechnology applications, robust well-characterized genetic tools are required for genetically modifying cyanobacteria, but these tools are often developed for specific model strains. Here, we used broad host-range RSF1010-based plasmids to characterize a set of orthogonal constitutive promoters in diverse cyanobacterial strains. The promoters are random variants of the synthetic
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.