ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Cue-Dependent Fear Learning Drives Nucleus Accumbens Spine Plasticity.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nucleus accumbens (NAc) dopamine 2 receptor expressing medium spiny neurons (D2-MSNs) are involved in stress and aversive learning, where repeated stress increases excitatory spine density. Whether this plasticity reflects cue-specific learning or generalized stress response remains unknown. Using Pavlovian fear conditioning in Tac1-Cre/Tdtomato mice, we dissociated associative plasticity from the effects of foot shock stress. Acute fear conditioning produced distinct physiological outcomes between stress in the presence or absence of a cue. Conditioning for 7 days consolidated cue learning and increased excitatory transmission frequency via an increase in the total spine density. However, repeated exposure to foot shock did not lead to this synaptic remodeling. Our results suggest that morphological changes supporting synaptic plasticity on NAc D2-MSNs are due to cue-dependent learning, but not foot shock stress alone. We propose that NAc D2-MSNs encode learning and response to threat cues, which may heighten later stress responsivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.