ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Improving isoform-level eQTL and integrative genetic analyses of breast cancer risk with long-read RNA transcript assemblies.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most eQTL and TWAS analyses quantify expression using aggregate, tissue-agnostic transcript annotations and ignore isoform-level regulation, potentially obscuring or misattributing regulatory mechanisms. Here, we developed a framework leveraging publicly available long-read RNA-seq data to perform tissue-informed inference of genetic regulation and prioritize candidate causal isoforms for breast cancer risk. We quantified gene- and isoform-level expression in breast tumor (TCGA), non-cancerous mammary tissue, and cultured fibroblasts (GTEx) using three transcriptome annotations: standard GENCODE, tissue-specific long-read-derived assemblies, and combined annotations incorporating transcript-isoforms from both. While GENCODE cataloged over 250,000 pan-tissue isoforms, the tissue-specific long-read assemblies captured reduced sets of 74,717 isoforms in tumor, 48,057 in fibroblasts, and 22,941 in healthy breast. We performed eQTL mapping and fine-mapping, followed by colocalization with overall and subtype-specific breast cancer GWAS and isoform-level TWAS. While most eGenes were concordant across annotations, approximately 1/3 of lead cis-eQTLs for shared eGenes differed between long-read assemblies and GENCODE. Further, eIsoform discovery was highly annotation-specific. In healthy breast tissue, the gold standard tissue for building gene expression prediction models for TWAS of breast cancer, 46% of eIsoforms identified by the long-read annotation were unique to that annotation even though 93.7% of them are present in GENCODE. Despite combined annotations expanding the GENCODE catalog by only 0.6-7.6% depending on tissue source, 69% of unique significant isoform-trait associations were specific to a single annotation. Long-read-informed annotations uncovered regulatory associations entirely missed by GENCODE, including a candidate regulatory isoform at the
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.