ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Neural subtypes in developmental stuttering.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Developmental stuttering is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by disfluent speech. At the individual level, the behavioral manifestations of stuttering vary considerably, likely reflecting heterogeneity in underlying neural mechanisms. In this study, we examined individual-specific differences in the brains of children who stutter (CWS), by implementing normative modeling, a framework that quantifies how an individual deviates from an age- and sex-matched reference population. We applied this approach to identify individual-specific structural brain atypicalities using gray and white matter volumes. These volumes were derived from MRI scans from a large mixed-longitudinal dataset of 235 and 240 scans from CWS and fluent controls respectively, aged between 3 and 12 years. Individual deviation maps capturing these atypicalities were then used to cluster CWS into subtypes based on similarities in their neuroanatomical profiles. This analysis identified four neural subtypes with distinct neuroanatomical atypicalities relative to fluent controls. The key findings were a basal ganglia-thalamo-cerebellar subtype associated with higher stuttering severity and lower rates of recovery, and a white matter subtype characterized by mild severity and a higher likelihood of recovery. The remaining two subtypes showed cerebellar differences alongside alterations in brain regions involved in sensorimotor integration. Moreover, cerebellar volume atypicalities were present in all four subtypes, indicating that cerebellar alterations were present across otherwise distinct neural profiles and may represent a shared neuroanatomical feature of stuttering. These findings indicate that examining individual-specific neural differences and subtyping based on patterns of neural atypicalities provides valuable insight into the heterogeneity of developmental stuttering and represents a promising direction for improving our understanding of the disorder.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.