ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
VIOLIN: A modular framework for scalable reconciliation of heterogeneous interaction graphs.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automated extraction of molecular interactions from scientific literature has outpaced the development of systematic methods for integrating this information with curated models and knowledge graphs. Here we present VIOLIN (Versatile Interaction Organizing to Leverage Information in Networks), a configurable, attribute-aware reconciliation framework that formally compares newly extracted interaction lists against structured baseline graphs. VIOLIN classifies each interaction as a corroboration, contradiction, flagged case, or extension, and supports configurable attribute inclusion strategies and mismatch semantics to adjust reconciliation strictness. We evaluate VIOLIN using interaction lists generated by two traditional NLP systems (REACH, INDRA) and two large language models (GPT-4.1, Llama 3) across multiple literature corpora and structurally distinct baseline graphs. Across all conditions, reconciliation outcomes were stable and interpretable, with extensions dominating and corroboration-contradiction balance reflecting intrinsic structural relationships between baseline graphs and extracted evidence. Sensitivity analyses demonstrate that attribute inclusion and classification scheme selection shift category boundaries predictably. Benchmark evaluations confirm high algorithmic correctness and alignment with expert curation. VIOLIN is publicly available as a Python package and through web-based interface (https://nmzlab.github.io/Tools-UI).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.