ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
A graph-based learning approach to predict the effects of gene perturbations on molecular phenotypes.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: Large-scale gene knockdown/knockout screens have been used to gain insight into a wide array of phenotypes and biological processes. However, conducting such experiments is expensive and labor-intensive. In this work, we present a general graph-based machine-learning approach that can predict the effects of gene perturbations on molecular phenotypes of interest given some measured phenotypic effects of other gene perturbations. The motivation for learning models that can predict the effects of gene perturbations is fourfold. Such models can (1) predict effects for unmeasured genes in cases in which cost or technical barriers preclude perturbing every gene, (2) prioritize unmeasured genes or sets of genes for subsequent perturbation experiments, (3) hypothesize mechanisms that underlie the relationships between the perturbed genes and their effects, and (4) generalize to other unmeasured phenotypes of interest. Results: We evaluate our approach by applying it, in conjunction with four different learning methods, to learn models for four varied phenotypes. Our empirical evaluation demonstrates that the learned models (1) show relatively high levels of predictive accuracy across the four phenotypes, (2) have better predictive accuracy than several standard baselines, (3) can often learn accurate models with small training sets, (4) benefit from having multiple sources of evidence in the input representation, (5) can, in many cases, transfer their predictive value to other phenotypes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.