ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Physiomimetic culture bias durotaxis toward soft environments.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Directed cell migration underlies many biological phenomena, from embryonic development to tumor metastasis and organ fibrosis. Most cells typically migrate toward stiffer regions of their extracellular matrix -a behavior known as positive durotaxis. Here we show that culture on rigid plastic reinforces this response, whereas preconditioning in soft 3D physiomimetic environments reprograms migration towards softer environments, a phenomenon known as negative durotaxis. Fetal rat lung fibroblasts preconditioned in 3D physiomimetic hydrogels exhibited negative durotaxis and accumulated near ~5 kPa, corresponding to the physiological stiffness of the lung. In contrast, genetically identical cells maintained on conventional 2D plastic substrates migrated up stiffness gradients, toward stiffer regions. Although both populations displayed a biphasic force-stiffness relationship, they differed in force magnitude and cytoskeletal organization. Molecular-clutch modeling revealed that durotaxis reversal emerges from two distinct mechanical regimes: a mechanosensitive, high-motor-clutch state that stabilizes adhesions on stiff substrates and drives positive durotaxis, and a low-motor, weak-adhesion state in which clutch slippage on the stiff side causes negative durotaxis. Our results show that durotaxis direction is not an intrinsic cellular property. Rather, it emerges from the interplay between motor activity and adhesion dynamics and can be tuned by culture conditions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.