ReviewMedicine international
Sequencing antibody-drug conjugates in metastatic cancer (Review).
Review in Medicine international. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The therapeutic landscape of metastatic solid tumors has been fundamentally reshaped by the rapid development and regulatory approval of multiple antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) across breast, urothelial and lung cancers. As these targeted agents move into earlier lines of therapy, patients are experiencing prolonged survival and are increasingly becoming candidates for sequential ADC treatment. This evolution introduces a critical and complex clinical dilemma: The question of whether a second 'Trojan Horse' remains effective following the failure of a prior ADC, or whether shared resistance mechanisms undermine sequential efficacy. While the expanding ADC armamentarium provides new therapeutic opportunities, emerging real-world data suggest that sequential use is frequently complicated by cross-resistance, particularly when successive agents employ similar cytotoxic payloads such as topoisomerase I inhibitors. The present narrative review critically discusses the biological basis of resistance in the sequential ADC setting. The present review distinguishes between target-mediated resistance, in which antigen downregulation limits drug delivery, and payload-mediated resistance, in which intracellular mechanisms neutralize the cytotoxic component. By synthesizing clinical evidence from metastatic breast and urothelial carcinoma cohorts, the present review highlights the diminished efficacy often observed when changing targets without altering payload class. Therefore, a pragmatic sequencing framework emphasizing 'payload swapping' is proposed, prioritizing a change in cytotoxic mechanisms over antigen switching to optimize patient outcomes and minimize futile toxicity in this rapidly evolving therapeutic era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.