Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41928919›Full record

ReviewMedicine international

Sequencing antibody-drug conjugates in metastatic cancer (Review).

Berun A Abdalla

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicine international. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Berun A AbdallaKscien Organization for Scientific Research (Middle East Office), Sulaymaniyah 46001, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The therapeutic landscape of metastatic solid tumors has been fundamentally reshaped by the rapid development and regulatory approval of multiple antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) across breast, urothelial and lung cancers. As these targeted agents move into earlier lines of therapy, patients are experiencing prolonged survival and are increasingly becoming candidates for sequential ADC treatment. This evolution introduces a critical and complex clinical dilemma: The question of whether a second 'Trojan Horse' remains effective following the failure of a prior ADC, or whether shared resistance mechanisms undermine sequential efficacy. While the expanding ADC armamentarium provides new therapeutic opportunities, emerging real-world data suggest that sequential use is frequently complicated by cross-resistance, particularly when successive agents employ similar cytotoxic payloads such as topoisomerase I inhibitors. The present narrative review critically discusses the biological basis of resistance in the sequential ADC setting. The present review distinguishes between target-mediated resistance, in which antigen downregulation limits drug delivery, and payload-mediated resistance, in which intracellular mechanisms neutralize the cytotoxic component. By synthesizing clinical evidence from metastatic breast and urothelial carcinoma cohorts, the present review highlights the diminished efficacy often observed when changing targets without altering payload class. Therefore, a pragmatic sequencing framework emphasizing 'payload swapping' is proposed, prioritizing a change in cytotoxic mechanisms over antigen switching to optimize patient outcomes and minimize futile toxicity in this rapidly evolving therapeutic era.

Indexed as

antibody-drug conjugatescross-resistancemetastatic cancerpayload swaptargeted therapytreatment sequencing

Identifiers

PMID41928919
PMCPMC13040639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.