Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41928897›Full record

ArticleEthical theory and moral practice : an international forum2026

Does Distributive Inequality Cause Relational Inequality? Evidence from a Survey Experiment.

Alice Baderin, Lucy Barnes, Lindsay Richards

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ethical theory and moral practice : an international forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alice BaderinDepartment of Politics and International Relations, University of Reading, 293 Edith Morley Building, Whiteknights, RG6 6EL Reading, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7207-8825
Lucy BarnesDepartment of Political Science, University College London, 29-31 Tavistock Square, WC1H 9QU London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6403-6657
Lindsay RichardsDepartment of Sociology, University of Oxford, 42-43 Park End Street, OX1 1JD Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0880-1104

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contemporary egalitarian theory has been shaped by a debate between distributive and relational perspectives. Relational egalitarians argue that equality is primarily about the character of our social and political relationships, rather than the pattern of distribution of goods. But they often also claim that distributive and relational ideals are connected in practice, because material inequality impairs our ability to stand as social and political equals. Using a survey experiment, we assess the impact of material inequality on relational equality. We show that priming income inequality increases perceptions of unequal social status; but it does not affect perceived equal political standing, or the extent to which respondents affirm the ideal of relational equality. We argue that this empirical approach yields deeper payoffs for conceptual and normative questions about relational equality; and it contributes to wider methodological debates about the role of survey data in normative political theory.

Indexed as

Distributive egalitarianismEmpirically-informed political theoryInequalityRelational egalitarianismSocial status

Identifiers

PMID41928897
PMCPMC13038695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.