ArticleImaging science in dentistry2026
Development and assessment of an
Article in Imaging science in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study proposes an Materials and Methods: Four half-maxillae and 4 half-mandibles from human cadaveric donors were scanned using a ddMRI system with a dental-specific coil. Two pulse sequences ("anatomy" and "inflammation") were applied. Each specimen was imaged at 4 time points: immediately after PBS immersion and after 24, 48, and 72 hours of washing, totaling 64 images. Image quality was evaluated using signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and conspicuity of anatomical structures: cortical bone, medullary bone, root contour, soft tissue, and the sinus floor/mandibular canal. Conspicuity was rated by 3 observers and analyzed using the Cochran Q test (α=0.05). Results: Cortical bone, medullary bone, and the sinus floor were depicted in all images; root contours (91.1%) and soft tissue (85.9%) were visible in most images. PBS washing did not significantly impact conspicuity ( Conclusion: The proposed ddMRI protocol enabled consistent visualization of dentomaxillofacial structures in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.