ArticleImaging science in dentistry2026
Morphological analysis of anatomical structure of nasopharynx in cone-beam computed tomography in Korean population.
Article in Imaging science in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluated the nasopharyngeal anatomy, particularly the fossa of Rosenmüller (FoR), on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in a Korean population to establish normative reference data by sex and age. Materials and Methods: In CBCT images, FoR was classified into three types (A-C) for image analysis. Measurements of nasopharyngeal dimensions were performed in Types B and C. Sex- and age-related differences were evaluated using chi-square and independent t-tests, and reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Results: In total, 492 CBCTs (244 males, 248 females; 20-69 years) were included. Type C was the most frequent morphology and increased with age. Types A and B were more prevalent among males than among females, whereas Type C was predominant among females (57.3%) compared with males (34.4%). Asymmetry was more frequent in males (13.9%) than in females (10.1%). Significant sex differences due to the larger males were found in the distance of the torus levatorius, the distance between the sphenopalatine notch and the right torus levatorius, and the horizontal and vertical dimensions of the FoR. No significant side-to-side differences were observed. Reliability was excellent (ICC=0.97). Conclusion: Type C was the most frequent morphology in both sexes, whereas Types A and B were more frequently observed in males than in females. These differences may indirectly contribute to sex-related disparities in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) incidence. The normative reference values may aid early detection in dental imaging, and further prospective studies including NPC patients are needed to clarify the role of nasopharyngeal morphology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.