Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41928829›Full record

ReviewDigital health

Digital twin applications in adult critical care: A scoping review of current development and implementation trends.

Yeonwoo Kim, Jiin Kim, Yeonju Kim, Mona Choi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yeonwoo KimCollege of Nursing and Brain Korea 21 FOUR Project, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1904-2250
Jiin KimCollege of Nursing and Brain Korea 21 FOUR Project, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7050-8955
Yeonju KimCollege of Nursing and Brain Korea 21 FOUR Project, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6797-6716
Mona ChoiCollege of Nursing and Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4694-0359

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Digital twins (DTs) show promise in critical care by enabling personalised treatment and optimising clinical decision-making. Despite the complexity and data-intensive nature of critical care, the implementation of DTs in this setting remains under-investigated. This scoping review aimed to summarise DT research in critical care and identify current evidence gaps. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, seven electronic databases were searched. Studies reporting the development or evaluation of DT models in adult critical care were included. Data were extracted on study characteristics and DT development features, including modelling approaches, levels of data integration, and key findings. Results: Twenty-three studies were included, with most originating from North America and Europe. Retrospective designs using hospital datasets derived from intensive care unit and emergency department settings were common. Data integration predominantly corresponded to the digital model level of the DT maturity, whereas fully automated DT implementations were rare. Regarding modelling approaches, mathematical models were most frequently developed, followed by machine learning-based predictive models. DT application primarily focused on predictive modelling and virtual patient simulations to enhance personalised treatment, support clinical decision-making, and optimise organisational resource allocation. Conclusion: DT technologies in critical care remain in the exploratory and early stages of development and implementation. Further research incorporating higher levels of data integration, real-time deployment, and longitudinal external validation is warranted, alongside broader consensus on ethical governance and data privacy.

Indexed as

clinical decision supportcritical caredigital healthdigital twinintensive care unitsscoping review

Identifiers

PMID41928829
PMCPMC13039604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.