Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41928775›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in chemistry2026

Next-generation nanomaterials for environmental remediation: smart design, hybrid materials and sustainable use.

Hina Singh, A S Dhanu, Abhayraj S Joshi, Ivan Mijakovic, Priyanka Singh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hina SinghDivision of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, Riverside, CA, United States.
A S DhanuDepartment of Biotherapeutics Research, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Abhayraj S JoshiDepartment of Biotherapeutics Research, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Ivan MijakovicSystems and Synthetic Biology Division, Department of Life Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Priyanka SinghDepartment of Health Technology, Section of Experimental and Translational Immunology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens, Lyngby, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental contamination has increased steadily over recent decades due to industrialization, urban expansion, intensive agriculture, and improper waste management. As a result, a wide range of pollutants, including per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), microplastics, pharmaceutical residues, endocrine-disrupting compounds, and heavy metals are now frequently detected in water, soil, and sediment systems worldwide. Many of these contaminants are chemically stable, persist for long periods in the environment, and can accumulate in living organisms, posing significant toxicological and ecological risks and making their removal particularly challenging. Engineered nanomaterials have emerged as promising tools for pollutant removal because of their tunable surface chemistry, and ability to interact with contaminants through multiple mechanisms. This review examines recent advances in eco-engineered nanomaterials for environmental remediation, with particular attention to green strategies, major material classes and their underlying removal mechanisms. Across the studies discussed, adsorption-based and hybrid systems frequently report high removal efficiencies for metals and dyes under controlled conditions, while framework-based materials show improved selectivity toward persistent pollutants (including PFAS) through combined electrostatic, hydrophobic, and hydrogen-bonding interactions. Photocatalytic and redox-active systems are highlighted for accelerating the degradation of recalcitrant organics through reactive oxygen species-mediated pathways. Recoverable designs, including magnetic and scaffold-immobilized composites, are also emphasized because they are often reported to retain substantial performance over multiple reuse cycles. Sustainability and deployment challenges are also discussed, including life-cycle assessment, material reuse, environmental fate, toxicity risks, and data-driven strategies for design and optimization.

Indexed as

AI-driven material designenvironmental remediationhybrid nanomaterialslife cycle assessmentmicroplasticsPFASsustainability, green synthesis

Identifiers

PMID41928775
PMCPMC13038622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.