ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Feasibility of EEG-based machine learning for the objective assessment of non-Strabismic binocular vision dysfunction.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the increasing prevalence of prolonged near work, non-strabismic binocular vision dysfunction (NSBVD) has become a growing concern. Current diagnostic methods primarily rely on subjective symptoms and time-consuming examinations, highlighting the need for objective physiological markers. This pilot study explores the feasibility of utilizing electroencephalography (EEG) combined with machine learning as an objective, auxiliary approach for NSBVD assessment. We analyzed EEG activity in 15 NSBVD patients and 15 healthy controls during a natural viewing vergence task. Time frequency and topographic analyses were used to identify neural features associated with vergence insufficiency. The groups exhibited distinct neural patterns. Healthy controls showed strong activation in visual areas, whereas NSBVD patients displayed reduced activity, coupled with compensatory increases in frontal activity, particularly in the theta and alpha bands. A linear support vector machine (SVM) trained on these features achieved 76.67% accuracy (AUC = 0.87). These findings suggest that specific neural patterns may serve as potential biomarkers for binocular dysfunction. This study demonstrated the feasibility of objective screening, though validation in larger cohorts is needed for clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.