ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Polarity-considered EEG microstates improve classification accuracy of oddball stimulus.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) require efficient feature extraction and dimensionality reduction from high-dimensional neural signals. Electroencephalogram (EEG) microstate analysis is a rapid and noise-resistant approach that classifies instantaneous EEG states into several spatial distribution patterns (templates). Previous BCI studies using the EEG microstate approach have typically used aggregated metrics, such as duration, frequency of occurrence, or time coverage, and have rarely applied pointwise microstate labeling as temporally ordered, one-dimensional sequences for robust classification. Moreover, the physiological relevance of EEG topographic polarity has often been overlooked, despite its potential to reveal smoother state transitions and align with event-related potential components. In this study, we applied polarity-considered microstate labeling to stimulus-driven classification in an oddball paradigm. EEG data from 40 healthy participants (20 per response type) were analyzed across three factors: stimulus modality (auditory or visual), modality condition (unimodal or cross-modal), and response type (key-response task or mental counting task). Preprocessed 32-channel EEG data were labeled with microstate templates (A-E ± topographical polarity) using a winner-take-all approach, and the resulting sequences were classified using multiple machine-learning models. The results showed that tree-based ensemble models (Random Forest, XGBoost, and CatBoost) achieved the most stable and accurate performance in the key-response task with cross-modal visual targets. These models reached an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve above 0.8 and a mean F1 score of 0.83. Preserving polarity improved classification by approximately 20% across tasks, doubling the label-space granularity and revealing temporal patterns aligned with the N200 and P300 components. Visual stimuli generally outperformed auditory stimuli, and cross-modal benefits emerged primarily in key-response tasks. These findings demonstrate that polarity-considered microstate labeling enhances classification accuracy and interpretability in BCIs. This method highlights the potential for real-time applications, such as P300 spellers and multimodal attention monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.