ArticleAmerican journal of botany2026
Flower color variation in Digitalis purpurea: Pollination and soil influences across native and introduced populations.
Article in American journal of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
premiseFlower color, a key trait influencing plant-pollinator interactions, may be influenced by abiotic factors such as soil. We investigated association between pollinators, soil characteristics, and flower color variations in Digitalis purpurea across native populations in Sweden and introduced populations in Bolivia.
methodsWe measured floral traits, reflectance of petals and nectar-guide spots, plant size, pollinator visitation, fruit set, seed production, germination, and soil characteristics.
resultsIndividuals were categorized into violet, pink, and white morphs, which were confirmed by spectral measurements and bee vision modelling. Reflectance of inner nectar-guide spots overlapped across morphs, potentially limiting pollinator discrimination. Bumblebees were the main pollinators in all populations. Although visitation varied among morphs, pollinator visits to different color morphs were population specific. In Bolivia, violet flowers were predominant (70-87%), with pink (13-17%) and white (0-13%) at lower frequencies. In Sweden, morph frequencies were more even (violet 20-43%, pink 38-69%, white 11-30%). Morph frequency was not associated with soil composition, despite differences between regions. Reproductive fitness varied across populations but not consistently among morphs: The largest Swedish population had the highest fruit set but the lowest seed set, while germination was lower in Bolivia. Phosphorus was lower in soil beneath violet individuals; other soil variables, plant size, and floral traits did not differ among color morphs.
conclusionsFloral color variation in D. purpurea was not significantly related to pollinator visitation or soil conditions at the spatial scale examined, suggesting maintenance by local environmental conditions, neutrality, or historical and demographic processes rather than selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.