ArticleNursing open2026
Adaptation of Self-Esteem Stability Scale Into Turkish: Validity and Reliability Study in Nurses.
Article in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Alexithymia in nurses: a context-specific concept analysis using rodgers's evolutionary methodology.BMC psychology · 2026Pooled it
- Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of a Thai Version of the Turnover Intention Scale (T-TIS) for Thai Nursing Professionals.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Scale on Community Care Perceptions (SCOPE) among nurses: a methodological study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study aimed to adapt the Self-Esteem Stability Scale (SESS) to Turkish and evaluate its validity and reliability among nurses. Understanding self-esteem stability is crucial for assessing psychological well-being in healthcare professionals.
designA cross-sectional methodological study.
methodsThe study included 305 nurses (83% women, 17% men), aged 20-47 (mean age = 28.57), working in a hospital setting. The psychometric evaluation of the Turkish version of the SESS involved exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA), assessment of criterion validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency.
resultsThe Turkish SESS showed a clear one-factor structure; EFA produced a first eigenvalue of 2.34 (> 1) explaining 78.08% of variance, with factor loadings 0.84-0.91 and corrected item-total correlations 0.66-0.78. CFA indicated excellent fit (CFI = 0.99; RMSEA = 0.03). Reliability was high (α = 0.86) with strong four-week test-retest stability (r = 0.84).
conclusionsThe Turkish version of the SESS is a valid and reliable tool for assessing self-esteem stability among nurses. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.