ArticleJournal of foot and ankle research2026
'I Didn't Know, I Definitely Guessed.' Exploring Pre-Registration Podiatry Students' Approach to Identifying Dermatological Conditions in Different Skin Tones, a Mixed Methods Study.
Article in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResearch suggests that healthcare professionals find it more difficult to correctly diagnose dermatological conditions in the nonwhite patient demographic. People of colour experience higher rates of delayed and misdiagnosis, contributing to an increased mortality risk and increased health inequalities that remain widespread throughout the health care setting. This study aimed to investigate podiatry student's ability, confidence, approaches and perceptions in diagnosing dermatology pathologies in different skin tones.
methodsA mixed methods explanatory sequential design was undertaken with pre-registration podiatry students from universities across South-central England. Participants completed a validated pictorial multiple-choice questionnaire comprising six images of either eczema or psoriasis in three different skin tone categories: light, medium or dark. Results were used to inform focus groups and a process of thematic analysis explored participants perceptions surrounding their diagnostic approaches and underpinning confidence.
resultsThe medium skin tone (Fitzpatrick groups III/IV) was associated with the most correct responses for psoriasis (69%) followed by light skin tone (Fitzpatrick groups I/II) with 48%. Psoriasis in darker skin tones (Fitzpatrick groups V/VI) received the least correct responses (3%). In eczema, results were more evenly spread with darker skin tones (Fitzpatrick groups V/VI), receiving a slightly higher percentage of correct diagnoses (39%). Qualitative analysis revealed two emergent themes: (i) reports on confidence and apprehension and (ii) limitations in education provision: each with a series of sub-themes. Participants reported barriers to their diagnostic ability included an underrepresentation of dark skin tones in medical images and inadequate exposure to pathology on patients with dark skin tones.
conclusionsThere was a notable lack of confidence in participants' ability to correctly diagnose dermatological pathology, particularly in dark skin tones. This study addresses the research gap in podiatric health inequalities and pinpoints the associated educational shortcomings from the podiatry education perspective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.