ArticleGenome biology and evolution2026
Detecting Positive Selection by Modeling Structure Within Images of Genetic Variation.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A major challenge in population genomics is accurately identifying and characterizing natural selection from genomic data. The wide availability of dense whole-genome datasets has enabled researchers to analyze and localize genetic variation within populations. Powerful supervised machine learning methods allow researchers to extract spatial information about genetic variation across the genome and identify traces of natural selection. While convolutional neural networks capture correlations among neighboring features, design choices such as heavy-pooling or limited receptive fields can lead to loss of fine-grained spatial resolution. Extensions like dilated convolutions or attention mechanisms mitigate this issue of loss of spatial resolution but at the cost of increased architectural complexity and parameter count when capturing correlations at different scales. In contrast, trend filtering directly models the autocovariation of neighboring features, ensuring that spatial relationships remain intact without any architectural extensions. When integrated into a classical machine learning model, such as a support vector machine, trend filtering offers a natural framework to create powerful predictive models while retaining the spatial integrity of the input. Here, we introduce SKINET, which employs a novel trend filter kernel within a support vector machine framework and apply it to the task of detecting and characterizing regions affected by positive natural selection. Specifically, SKINET not only distinguishes regions under positive natural selection from neutrally evolving regions but also functions in a regression framework to estimate associated adaptive parameters. Moreover, applying SKINET to empirical human genome variation identifies adaptive candidate genes consistent with previous findings while also uncovering novel adaptation targets, such as FAM177A1, that are linked to cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.