ArticleJournal of experimental botany2026
Optimized protocol for efficient generation, confirmation, transformation, and CRISPR editing of grapevine hairy roots.
Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Genetic Transformation Mechanism and Application of Plant Hairy Roots.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hairy root cultures (HRCs) are powerful tools in plant biotechnology but show variable establishment efficiencies, limiting broader applications. Here, we present a standardized and optimized reference methodology for the routine generation, multiplication, and maintenance of HRCs across diverse grapevine genotypes. Our workflow evaluated three Rhizobium strains, seven grapevine cultivars (three Vitis vinifera cultivars; four Vitis rootstock hybrids), multiple explant types, infection protocols, co-cultivation times, growth media types, and anti-browning agents. The resulting protocol was effective for all grapevine genotypes and, with minor adjustments, also yielded HRCs from two other important South African plant species, namely Sutherlandia frutescens and Aspalathus linearis. Useful molecular tools were developed for transformation and selection of HRCs, including universal multiplex primers for confirmation of transformation, tested antibiotic resistance markers (kanamycin and hygromycin), and fluorescent reporters (DsRed and eyGFPuv), with DsRed found to be particularly versatile. To test the system, we overexpressed the VviMYBA1 transcription factor gene, leading to increased anthocyanin accumulation and red pigmentation in HRCs. Additionally, we achieved CRISPR/Cas9 editing of the VviPUB19 gene, the first report of CRISPR-edited grapevine HRCs. Gene editing combined with HRCs can facilitate rapid gene function studies, offering an efficient alternative or pre-screening system to whole-plant transformations, that could support advanced functional genomics and biotechnological applications in grapevine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.