ArticleSociology of health & illness2026
Choreographing Triage: Making Patient Requests 'Flow' Through Digitally Enabled Systems of Access and Decision-Making in NHS Primary Care.
Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper explores the altered landscape of primary care following the accelerated process of implementing digitally enabled triage across UK general practice in response to COVID-19. Traditional understandings of triage are based on a static 'pile sorting' logic, which suggests that triage outcomes depend upon a single decision in time and space. With the introduction of remote, asynchronous and distributed decision-making, triage needs a more dynamic conceptualisation. Drawing on a team ethnography in three GP practices in England, we develop the concept of triage choreography to explore the (often hidden) work involved in achieving the flow of patient requests through triage systems. We ask who participates in this work, who might be excluded and the consequences for triage outcomes. Our findings extend the literature on digital in/exclusion in primary care, providing a critical analysis of 'flow' in digitally enabled triage and what it means for patients. We show how, as patient requests enter digital systems, triaging work becomes distributed, often in uneven ways. And although digitally enabled routes through systems afford faster and smoother movement, they can also limit patients' ability to influence how they access care and the modality in which it is delivered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.