SynthesisJournal of cosmetic dermatology2026
Classification of High Curl Pattern Hair: A Systematic Review and Clinical Perspective.
Synthesis in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Classification of High Curl Pattern Hair: A Systematic Review and Clinical Perspective.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHair type classification is crucial for developing personalized hair care, maximizing hair health, and selecting appropriate treatment for scalp disorders, yet it remains underutilized in clinical practice.
aimsThis review aimed to address three main questions: (1) How can hair types be defined according to specific shape criteria, without referring to race/ethnicity? (2) Why does certain hair exhibit a curly pattern, and how does curly hair behave uniquely? (3) How is the classification of curly hair clinically relevant to the development of seborrheic dermatitis?
methodsPubMed and Google Scholar were the primary and secondary platforms used for the literature search, respectively. The scope of the search included English-language human studies published between 2000 and 2025 that investigated classification systems defining hair types based on specific shape criteria.
resultsThe literature review revealed four mainstream hair classification systems: the André Walker Hair Typing System, the LOIS Hair Typing System, the FIA Hair Typing System, and the L'Oréal Curl Classification System. There are shared characteristics across the systems, as each was built on previous ones to incorporate nuances of different hair types and curl patterns. The L'Oréal Curl Classification System acknowledges the broader continuum of hair types by categorizing straight, wavy, curly, and coiled hair using four morphological parameters.
conclusionsThere are several existing hair classification systems that dermatologists and other health care professionals can use to optimize communication with patients. Dermatologists' use of these classification systems and increased awareness of practices for high-curl-pattern hair could ultimately improve treatment outcomes. Curl pattern classification may also have predictive value in the treatment of scalp diseases (e.g., seborrheic dermatitis), but further validation is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.