Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41928361›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2026

Metagenomic insights into the global wild boar faecal microbiome reveal novel taxa and carbohydrate degraders distinguishing wild and domesticated Sus.

Yu Chyuan Heng, Joanna Hui Xin Chua, Shaktheeshwari Silvaraju, Huan Fan, Adrian Low, Amber Ching Han Lim, Binbin Chen, Lokesh Mane, Sumit Singh Dagar, Katerina Fliegerova and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Yu Chyuan HengWilmar International Limited, Singapore, 138568, Singapore.
Joanna Hui Xin ChuaWilmar International Limited, Singapore, 138568, Singapore.
Shaktheeshwari SilvarajuWilmar International Limited, Singapore, 138568, Singapore.
Huan FanWilmar International Limited, Singapore, 138568, Singapore.
Adrian LowTemasek Life Sciences Laboratory, Singapore, 117604, Singapore.
Amber Ching Han LimWilmar International Limited, Singapore, 138568, Singapore.
Binbin ChenWilmar International Limited, Singapore, 138568, Singapore.
Lokesh ManeAgharkar Research Institute, Pune, Maharashtra, 411004, India.
Sumit Singh DagarAgharkar Research Institute, Pune, Maharashtra, 411004, India.
Katerina FliegerovaInstitute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, CAS, Prague, 14220, Czech Republic.
Giuseppe MonielloDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Via Vienna 2, Sassari, 07100, Italy.
Wakako Ikeda-OhtsuboGraduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, 980-8572, Japan.
Kei OkudaFaculty of Human Environmental Studies, Hiroshima Shudo University, Hiroshima, 731-3195, Japan.
Henning SeedorfTemasek Life Sciences Laboratory, Singapore, 117604, Singapore.
Kevin Junliang LimWilmar International Limited, Singapore, 138568, Singapore.
Sandra KittelmannWilmar International Limited, Singapore, 138568, Singapore. sandra.kittelmann@sg.wilmar-intl.com.

Funding

Anusandhan National Research Foundation (ANRF), DST, Government of India Project number CRG/2022/008319Fondazione di Sardegna, Italy FDS2223MONIELLO - CUP J83C22000160007University of Sassari University Research Fund 2020Wilmar International WIL@NUS Corporate Laboratory, Singapore
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe inclusion of fibre in domestic pig diets is favourable from a digestive health, environmental, and socio-economic perspective. Unlike the highly optimized formulated diets of domestic pigs, wild boars feed opportunistically, consuming a broad range of foods that consist predominantly of plant materials. Consequently, the intestinal microbiota of wild boars is thought to be adapted to a versatile, fibre-rich diet and may represent a valuable source of probiotics for enhancing fibre degradation. However, comprehensive studies characterizing the wild boar gut microbiome, particularly its community structure and carbohydrate utilization potential, and comparison to that of domestic pigs are still lacking.

resultsWe collected 89 faecal samples from wild boars across four countries and analysed them primarily using metagenomic sequencing. De novo assembly yielded 3,288 high- and medium-quality metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) representing 968 distinct species, of which 538 were previously unknown. Incorporating these MAGs enabled robust microbiome comparisons with 125 previously published samples largely from domestic pigs, which revealed significant structural and functional differences. These differences resolved into two community types, determined not by host species but by diet and lifestyle: C1 comprising 81% of samples from free-ranging, foraging wild boars and C2 consisting of 93% of samples from captive, fed domestic pigs. The lower alpha-diversity observed in C1 likely reflected the impact of highly fluctuating dietary resources and environmental conditions, resulting in dominance of fewer resilient or adaptable taxa. Nevertheless, both community types maintained substantial carbohydrate utilization potential: while C2 exhibited a higher relative abundance of CAZyme

conclusionsThis study uncovered the previously untapped microbial diversity in the wild boar faecal microbiome and demonstrated that the faecal microbiome of Sus is primarily shaped by diet and lifestyle. The two community types identified, which differed both structurally and functionally, represent alternative states of microbiome homeostasis in wild versus domesticated Sus populations. The curated catalogue of carbohydrate degraders provides a valuable resource to guide tailored probiotic supplementation during dietary transitions to novel fibrous feedstocks. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

BacteriaFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMetagenomicsSus scrofaAnimalsAnimals, WildCarbohydrate MetabolismDietDietary FiberMetagenomePhylogenySequence Analysis, DNASwineDietary FiberAristaeellaceaeBiogeographyFibre degradationMetagenome-assembled genomesMetagenomicsNovel speciesOscillospiraceaeSus scrofaWild boar

Identifiers

PMID41928361
PMCPMC13169683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.